Hi!
On Oct 10, 2008, at 3:13 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
Of course, this means that a pluggable type needs to be able to be
done
in a sensible way. Defining the types through SQL a-la the standard is
retarded. SQL is a query language for crying out loud.
The UDT tries to achieve this by creating public structures. When I
think of this, I only think of this in terms of libraries written in
some language (C++, JAVA, etc).
Cheers,
-Brian
--
_______________________________________________________
Brian "Krow" Aker, brian at tangent.org
Seattle, Washington
http://krow.net/ <-- Me
http://tangent.org/ <-- Software
_______________________________________________________
You can't grep a dead tree.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
