On 10/14/08, Ask Bjørn Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Oct 13, 2008, at 10:55, Jim Starkey wrote: > > You are right if you think about transaction context. The thing is most >>> web shops, almost all, run in autocommit mode. This is the 80% case (if not >>> more). Of course when you run within the context of a transaction you have >>> an issue, I mentioned that in my original email, but the majority case does >>> not do this. They fire off seven queries, get the results, and then build a >>> page. >>> >> >> Gosh, Brian, that's a pretty good argument for an aggregating interface. >> Of course then they would have a single transaction and the results would >> even be consistent. >> > > I think that's missing the point a little pushing the transactions. :-) > Not using transacions isn't just being lazy; in many applications most > queries can be done safely without transactions. Spending any CPU cycles on > them would just be wasted.
Not to mention disk I/O. Jeremy
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
