On 12/1/08, Monty Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think requiring primary keys (even if they're hidden like tables > "without" them in innodb and ndb) is fine. > > I think that most of the time when people think they don't want them, they > are wrong.
I think many times most people don't want a surrogate primary key, but if I'm remembering correctly, real relational databases have primary keys, period. :) Regardless, I think perhaps supporting both the LIMIT and Oracle's ROWNUM syntax would be a smart thing. -Sheeri
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
