Hi! On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:38 AM, Brian Aker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 1, 2008, at 5:34 PM, Roland Bouman wrote: > >> Perhaps you mean that currently, replication is limited to what can be >> expressed in SQL? (In which case you can't ever use any non-exposed >> internal row-identifiers?) > > Bingo :)
Ok, all clear - thanks for explaining and my apologies for not understanding (I guess I could've known this if I'd read more mail from the list) > I believe though that this is temporary in design. Until we have a good > interface/disconnect between the parser and the rest of the system I sort of > fear bypassing the parser. Well, I am not an expert but they only way around this seems to be some form of row-level replication? (Sorry for stating the obvious...) Don't get me wrong - I am not saying "drizzle should have rbr", rather I am saying that I don't see how fixing the parser-server entanglement can solve this issue. kind regards, Roland > > Cheers, > -Brian > > -- > _______________________________________________________ > Brian "Krow" Aker, brian at tangent.org > Seattle, Washington > http://krow.net/ <-- Me > http://tangent.org/ <-- Software > _______________________________________________________ > You can't grep a dead tree. > > > > -- Roland Bouman http://rpbouman.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
