Brian Moon wrote:
This would likely mean the dropping of the IGNORE keyword from Drizzle's
SQL syntax.
Standards are for breaking. Or is that rules? Really, it *feels* like
Drizzle is becoming more about making an SQL standards compliant DBS
than one that is fast, maintainable and good for scale out. I
understand wanting to have known expectations. But, I have just seen
"we should do x because it is the standard" thrown around a lot lately.
Whereas, when Drizzle started, the tone was more to use the standard
where the standard made sense and not use it when it did not make sense.
Maybe it does make sense in this case, but, I just don't see the
discussion happening these days.
I think it is more "if we are going to do X", then do it as the standard
tells. If you need extensions, make extensions. But make them in the
tradition of the standard, with consistency and extensibility in mind...
Thanks,
Roy
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
