> 2) What do people think about adding microsecond to the TIMESTAMP data type > by default? This would require 4 more bytes of storage per row.
timestamp with second precision is still useful. Make a new storage type, call it MICROTIMESTAMP or something like that. Don't break existing behavior. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
