On Dec 23, 2008, at 1:39 PM, Baron Schwartz wrote:
2) What do people think about adding microsecond to the TIMESTAMP
data type
by default? This would require 4 more bytes of storage per row.
timestamp with second precision is still useful. Make a new storage
type, call it MICROTIMESTAMP or something like that. Don't break
existing behavior.
How about calling it VMSTIMESTAMP and having it follow the VMS epoch
system?
I'm only partly kidding!
(JimS, if you want to step in and describe it?)
--
Mark Atwood <http://mark.atwood.name>
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
