On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Ian Holsman <[email protected]> wrote:
> First. I think the information will be skewed toward developer boxes and > smaller installs, as people will probably say 'yes' when they install it on > their workstations, but not when they install it on a 50-node farm, as those > installs would be more automated in a traditional shop, and in my experience > operations people don't like having things running on production machines > that aren't absolutely necessary. > > secondly you would need to have it phone home on a regular basis, especially > if you want to compare configs, or compare sizes, this would make it less > likely to get it run on a production box I would think. i don't know - if it can be explained as "by reporting this kind of stuff we can make sure that your workload is being optimized and we're spending the appropriate attention on the right things" - as drizzle is a paradigm shift from mysql, perhaps the thinking around it can change too (glass half full) _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
