gah...forgot to send to list. On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:05 AM, Roland Bouman <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Stewart Smith <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 01:04:59AM -0800, Monty Taylor wrote: >> or, could have a capability based thing.... e.g. /*!has:storedproc*/ or > > This looks like a nice feature, could come in handy if you want to > make scripts deal intelligently with a plugin being (not) there. > But then again...if you can have conditional code according to whether > a plugin is there, it would seem the logical thing to be able to > target the conditional towards a particular version of the plugin. > > (Not saying this makes things easier, just that it seems logical) > >> something? these code paths shouldn't be frequently hit... (mainly >> restoring a dump?) so could be okay... > > I don't understand...why not? > > kind regards, > > Roland > > >> -- >> Stewart Smith >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss >> Post to : [email protected] >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> > > > > -- > Roland Bouman > http://rpbouman.blogspot.com/ >
-- Roland Bouman http://rpbouman.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
