On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:59:35AM -0700, Brian Aker wrote: > There is in our syntax the concept of LOW/HIGH priority queries. It > doesn't really do anything internally right now.
I don't think this is too much use as it's below where you want to be doing the prioritising. e.g. for a key lookup that's cached, once we've parsed the query to find out if it's LOW or HIGH we've done 50% of the work already. Having bits in protocol likely better. sort of like niceness... could then do really funky stuff like for suitably low priority, return ETOOBUSY or something. -- Stewart Smith _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
