++
On Apr 2, 2009, at 5:43 PM, Jay Pipes <[email protected]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Currently, we have a single directory where all protobuffer message
classes are compiled and created: /drizzled/serialize
In parts of the drizzled kernel, we have started using namespaces
properly, and namespace drizzled:: is attached to a few classes now.
The protobuffer message classes however are in the drizzle (note, no
ending "d") namespace, as package drizzle; is used in the table.proto
proto file.
I propose two things:
1)
Rename the /drizzled/serialize/ directory to /drizzled/message to more
properly communicate the fact that classes and protos defined in that
directory are for protobuffer derived Message classes. "serialize"
implies that the directory contains some utilities for just
serializing
data, which is partly correct, but the classes are of class "Message",
not "Serialize". Just like our Field classes are in /drizzled/
field, etc...
Yea or Nay?
2)
Rename the drizzle:: namespace currently being used for the table
proto
(and very, very soon for the replication event protos) to namespace
drizzled::message.
Yea or Nay?
- -jay
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAknVW7oACgkQ2upbWsB4UtGQbACcC/G0J+B+Xprp9xuGZBQC2TT0
puUAni9ZMjnCA2cztx4rba7qClQZrvwP
=fFlb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
