Hi!
On May 4, 2009, at 10:58 AM, Jim Starkey wrote:
Adding C++ triggers right now would be easy (and from the interface
Monty Taylor could tie a half a dozen other languages, including
Java).
I don't believe that un-sandboxed user code should ever be allowed
in a database system. I did that Interbase and felt guilty for 25
years.
To me Gearman workers are much safer but I don't believe locking out
solutions. If someone wants to use a Java plugin over a C++ one for
security?
Let them.
INACTIVE
CLASS <trigger class>
This is the part I was curious about. I'd essentially do the same
thing... though I wonder if this was addressed in the standard in
later versions (my SQL 99 reference book doesn't have an option for
anything but SQL parsed triggers).
Cheers,
-Brian
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
