Hi!
On Jun 22, 2009, at 9:09 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
A few of the other typedefs I think aren't as terrible - although I'm
not a fan of ha_rows...
A funny thing about ha_rows. One storage engine vendor never realized
that it was a uint64_t and was surprised when someone finally shoved
one too many rows in their engine.
This sort of thing is why I don't like hiding types. Its nice
shorthand, and it does make me realize sometimes that "this is an
object" more then just a type, but still... It also doesn't provide
any sort of type safety (which a strunct with a single member will
do... but I don't know how others feel about that).
One other note about structs, except for the places where we need POD,
I would like to see them all go away.
Cheers,
-Brian
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
