On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 07:06:21AM -0700, Brian Aker wrote: > I saw this gem from Mats today: > > "I would prefer if we never used typedef to introduce aliases for > struct/class/union, they cause more problem that it's worth, and they > are not > needed in C++ at all." > > We should do this as well. There are only a few places where we should > be using typedef at this point, and even in those few cases I still > wonder if we should be (mainly I think of ha_rows).
+1 typedef usually not needed (even in C). You want to know if what you're dealing with is a struct. -- Stewart Smith _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
