My 2c ... always make things obvious and explicit if possible ( I
pretty much never use the keyword "struct" and am a "C++ person" :)
- Bob
On Jul 8, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
FWIW- the C++ people seem to follow the convention of declaring
classes
as structs if they have no private members. I personally don't like
that
and would rather just see class Foo { public: ... } ... but it does
seem
to be common practice and saves a line of text for things like:
struct MyCallback
{
int operator(int x, int y) () { return x+y; }
}
thoughts? We should standardize one way or the other, I think.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
