Brian Aker wrote:
Hi!
So what do folks want:
string& foo;
or
string &foo;
I slightly prefer the first because it makes a few things simpler
(aka... like dropping the name of a param when we don't use it in a
method), but either way is fine.
The second can be as simple to drop a param:
string &
works just fine as an unused parameter slot. :)
For pointer:
string *foo;
or
string* foo;
I prefer the first, and I don't mind the clash in style. I'd like to
pick one though.
I prefer consistency, and would vote for this style:
string *foo
string &foo
Cheers!
Jay
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
