Brian Aker wrote: > Hi! > > So what do folks want: > string& foo; > > or > string &foo; > > I slightly prefer the first because it makes a few things simpler > (aka... like dropping the name of a param when we don't use it in a > method), but either way is fine. > > For pointer: > string *foo; > or > string* foo; > > I prefer the first, and I don't mind the clash in style. I'd like to > pick one though.
I vote for string *foo and string& foo. I also don't mind the style difference. Monty _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
