Hi The current status is that it has a handful of real-world users, so I guess I cannot say much about the quality, other than the fact that it passes the almost 250 test cases I have (or, atleast it does when i fix the table definitions to always have a PK): http://marcus.no-ip.biz/hudson/job/drizzle-jdbc-freestyle/.
Not sure what you mean by official build, but the builds at the central maven repo are very official (to me) :). I'd say, ship the driver but let users know that it is an early version and where to report bugs. /Marcus On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Robert Hodges <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi all, > > I’m working on integrating Marcus’ recent Tungsten replication patch so > that we can start officially supporting Drizzle in Tungsten version 1.3. > However, this brings up a question: what’s the current status of the JDBC > driver and is there any plan to do official builds in the near future? > > Among other things I’m wondering whether it makes sense to distribute a > built version of the JDBC or just let users (probably not large group at > this point) do their own builds and add the driver themselves. > > (I could just ask Marcus but this seems like something that might be of > general interest.) > > Cheers, Robert > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
