Done. Thanks Marcus. With luck this will get the JDBC driver and Drizzle some more users over the next few months.
Cheers, Robert On 1/4/10 2:19 PM PST, "Marcus Eriksson" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > The current status is that it has a handful of real-world users, so I guess I > cannot say much about the quality, other than the fact that it passes the > almost 250 test cases I have (or, atleast it does when i fix the table > definitions to always have a PK): > http://marcus.no-ip.biz/hudson/job/drizzle-jdbc-freestyle/. > > Not sure what you mean by official build, but the builds at the central maven > repo are very official (to me) :). > > I'd say, ship the driver but let users know that it is an early version and > where to report bugs. > > /Marcus > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Robert Hodges <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I¹m working on integrating Marcus¹ recent Tungsten replication patch so that >> we can start officially supporting Drizzle in Tungsten version 1.3. However, >> this brings up a question: what¹s the current status of the JDBC driver and >> is there any plan to do official builds in the near future? >> >> Among other things I¹m wondering whether it makes sense to distribute a built >> version of the JDBC or just let users (probably not large group at this >> point) do their own builds and add the driver themselves. >> >> (I could just ask Marcus but this seems like something that might be of >> general interest.) >> >> Cheers, Robert >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss >> Post to : [email protected] >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> >> >> _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
