On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:44:34 Monty Taylor wrote: > Brian Aker wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I can go either way with this, but I know that in some cases we need > > to have it mixed. > > > > There is also the issue of creating "holes" in the structure. When > > packing the structures/classes we can't always be neat about this. > > Totally agree with that! > > Perhaps suggest then: > > public: protected: private: methods... then all member variables > starting off in that order (which should be fine, because they should > all be private anyway) but with exceptions as needed for packing reasons?
I'm curious as the need to care about packing. In every C++ project I've worked in before this has never been an issue. Why does it matter for drizzle? Tim _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
