On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Jay Pipes <[email protected]> wrote: > I strongly disagree. Cache misses did not suddenly eclipse LOCK open or the > parser's poor performance just because someone's been playing around with > pahole. > > Seriously, can we just settle on this bikeshed topic and move on to more > important things?
Ok, so after reading all the responses, is this a valid text to place in this point in the coding standards: "Your class definition should start with its public: section, followed by its protected: section and then its private: section. If any of these sections are empty, omit them." I omitted the issue of packing and mixing the order of declarations as I'm not sure that belongs in a coding standard. If I hear no objections, I'll update the coding standards this evening. -Padraig > > -jay > > On Feb 10, 2010 2:09 AM, "Stewart Smith" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 01:11:27PM +1300, Tim Penhey wrote: >> I'm curious as the need to care about ... > > cache misses are now the most expensive thing. if we put the most > commonly used members together so they fit in the same cacheline, we > can get large increases in performance. > > -- > Stewart Smith > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discus... > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
