On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Jay Pipes <[email protected]> wrote: > 1) They both take either 7 or 19 bytes of storage (depending on > whether you store v4 or v6 IP addresses. This seems a waste to me. > After all, we were originally discussing this based on a finding that > using BIGINT vs INT UNSIGNED was wasteful. I think I would prefer to > see an ipv4 type and an ipv6 type, with fixed sizes of 4 bytes and 16 > bytes respectively.
Is it safe to assume that an ipv6 col could store correctly an v4 address? -- Rob Wultsch [email protected] _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
