On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Waqas Iftikhar <coldheart...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hello Mr. Eriksson, > > We've been working on the code of the JDBC testing suite to incorporate > the changes you suggested. We've succeeded in passing the address of the > Drizzle server to connect to the testing code from the command line. While > running the code, we have noticed that the connection is established on 3 > ports 3306, 3307 and 4427. The tests on port 3306 and 4427 are a success > after amending the source code. However, the testing suite is unable to > establish connection to the server on port 3307 since there's Drizzle > server is not listening on that port. > > We have a suggestion here. Why don't we also take the port number to > connect to as a parameter as well along with the addresses as well. > Something like this, -Ddrizzle.test.address=8.8.8.8:3306. What are your > thoughts on this? yes, of course, include the port /Marcus
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : drizzle-discuss@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
