i dont really see how that patch could work ill comment more in detail off-list
/Marcus On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Waqas Iftikhar <coldheart...@gmail.com>wrote: > We have done what you have suggested and uploaded the diff and files on > github. > Link: > https://github.com/coldheartpks/DrizzleJDBC/commit/4eb265e884fd76344c26ff8ebb879499f272f3dc > We can test now by using > -Ddrizzle.test.address=8.8.8.8<http://8.8.8.8:3306/>-Dmysql.test.address= > 8.8.8.8 <http://8.8.8.8:3306/> (do not specify port, then it will use the > default port set in code) > OR > -Ddrizzle.test.address=8.8.8.8:4427 > <http://8.8.8.8:3306/>-Dmysql.test.address= > 8.8.8.8:3306 > > > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Waqas Iftikhar <coldheart...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> For this we will need to have a user which has the privilege to access >> database "unit_test_jdbc" over the network remotely as root user cannot >> connect to drizzle remotely. >> >> So what do you suggest should the tester give the whole connection string >> in argument to maven like : >> -Ddrizzle.test.string=waqas@8.8.8.8:3306 >> OR >> give address and user name in separate parameters >> -Ddrizzle.test.address=8.8.8.8:3306 -Ddrizzle.test.user=waqas >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Marcus Eriksson <krum...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Waqas Iftikhar >>> <coldheart...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Hello Mr. Eriksson, >>>> >>>> We've been working on the code of the JDBC testing suite to incorporate >>>> the changes you suggested. We've succeeded in passing the address of the >>>> Drizzle server to connect to the testing code from the command line. While >>>> running the code, we have noticed that the connection is established on 3 >>>> ports 3306, 3307 and 4427. The tests on port 3306 and 4427 are a success >>>> after amending the source code. However, the testing suite is unable to >>>> establish connection to the server on port 3307 since there's Drizzle >>>> server is not listening on that port. >>>> >>>> We have a suggestion here. Why don't we also take the port number to >>>> connect to as a parameter as well along with the addresses as well. >>>> Something like this, -Ddrizzle.test.address=8.8.8.8:3306. What are >>>> your thoughts on this? >>> >>> >>> yes, of course, include the port >>> >>> /Marcus >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards Waqas >> > > > > -- > Regards Waqas >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : drizzle-discuss@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
