./build.pl test 

from the command-line will run my rudimentary tests...

        -bob


On Sat, 13 Oct 2001, Dave Cramer wrote:

> Bob,
> 
> Do you have any test data that I can try running through the engine. I
> have some time to look at this today
> 
> Dave 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of bob
> mcwhirter
> Sent: October 13, 2001 10:30 AM
> To: James Strachan
> Cc: John P.Sheppard; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [droolers] Re: A question pertaining to DROOL's
> 
> 
> 
> Howdy John (thanks for the pointer deref, James)--
> 
> drools is still trying to find its way, at this point.
> 
> It started as an independant project, but now it's looking like
> (hopefully) my Day Job will buy into it also.
> 
> While the current code-base is 'from scratch', I may actually start over
> again, and base it upon the JEOPS rule engine.
> (http://sf.net/projects/jeops/).
> 
> JEOPS seems to have stalled, and requires you to compile
> your rules into .java files, which you then compile into
> .class files.  Which is a pain.
> 
> So, I may be looking to take JEOPS and...
> 
>       a) Make it compatible with JDK 1.4
>          (rename 'assert()' method so as not to
>          comflict with the new 'assert' keyword.
>          Change usage of Vector ot ArrayList, etc)
> 
>       b) Make the rules themselves interpreted,
>          instead of compile.
> 
>       c) Add time-knowledge components, so that
>          you can perform time-based rules (ie,
>          trouble-ticket escalation after X minutes).
> 
> I have no clue about .Net really, but I have a feeling
> that the changes in (b) would make life difficult.
> 
> Though, you may be able to 'port' it to the new 
> .Net Visual J#, or something.
> 
> Anyhow, I'm not at all offended and would be more than
> happy to work with you to accomplish everyone's goals.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
>       -bob
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2001, James Strachan wrote:
> 
> > Hi John
> > 
> > Actually its Bob's project not mine, though I'm interested in drools 
> > and am tracking it closely.
> > 
> > Just a thought; why not develop all the code as Java then just have a 
> > bytecode / java transformer to turn it into C#? It seems to me that C#
> 
> > is a Java clone so why not just put some effort into a Java -> C# 
> > compiler instead? That'd be much more useful to C# folks and would 
> > avoid dual coding on many projects.
> > 
> > James
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "John P.Sheppard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2001 4:53 AM
> > Subject: A question pertaining to DROOL's
> > 
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > >   I know this is going to sound like kind of a bizarre question, and
> 
> > > I don't want to offend you by it.  Would you ever consider a port to
> 
> > > the MS .NET framework using C#?
> > >   Let me tell you why I am asking this question.  I have been 
> > > searching high and low for a rule engine for the .NET framework and,
> 
> > > to be quite frank, there is none.  I would like to volunteer for 
> > > porting DROOL to the .NET platform. I have already downloaded the 
> > > source code and ran it through Togethersoft 5.5 and skinned out the 
> > > classes to C#.  I won't flesh out any of the classes unless you and
> > > your team buy into the idea of the port.  I also think that
> > > I could contribute to the overall progress of the project.
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > drools-interest mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> drools-interest mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> drools-interest mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest
> 


_______________________________________________
drools-interest mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest

Reply via email to