On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Stuart Schmukler wrote: > Bob, > > The format you propose is interesting. I believe that it is > on flexible enough. Both the condition and the action should be > expressions, otherwise the format is just some kind of dymanic > preprocessor. > > I believe that one of your goals was to have a dynamic rules > engine. Forcing the rules actions to be references to methods in > the root class binds the rule to the class very tightly.
Yah, after writing that, I decided roughly the same thing. I'm currently investigating my options to avoid having to write a full java expression and statement interpreter. Yah, we'll keep it all loosely bound and avoid compile-time constraints. _______________________________________________ drools-interest mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest
