> Is there any attempt being made to maintain interface compatibility with
> JSR 94 ?
I haven't seen the final spec for JSR 94, but from what I had learned,
a while ago, it really doesn't address many aspects of rules engines.
> In other words, if I wrote my application to use Drools, and I wanted to
> switch to JESS or a JSR 94 rules engine later, would I have to re-write
> everything or just make minor tweaks?
I think it might mean that your application code may not have to change,
if converting between JSR-94-compliant implementations. But, nothing
in JSR-94 specifies the format of rules, etc. So, you'd have to port
your rulebase from one to the other anyhow.
Though, once JSR-94 is public (or I trip across it again), I'll do what
I can to make drools compliant. I just don't think it's truly going
to mean much, in the grand scheme of things.
-bob
_______________________________________________________________
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -
http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink
_______________________________________________
drools-interest mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest
