Hi Marianne and Lisa, DSpace does support self-registration, this is even the default. Furthermore you can have a stack of authentication methods see https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSDOC5x/Authentication+Plugins for details.
The workflows in DSpace are configurable https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSDOC5x/Configurable+Workflow so you may enhance them for your reviewing process. Hope this helps Claudia Jürgen Am 04.08.2016 um 18:22 schrieb Reed, Marianne A.:
Our repository has a mechanism where external users of the repository can register and create accounts<https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/password-login>. Once a user is registered, they can be assigned to Groups and granted authorization to bitstreams, etc. I hadn’t realized that capability wasn’t built into DSpace itself, so sorry for the confusion. -- Marianne From: Lisa Johnston [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2016 10:43 AM To: Reed, Marianne A. <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [dspace-community] Blind peer review in dspace Thanks Marianne for your suggestion. We have looked into the authorizations approach and the only problem is that all of the reviewers are external to us, so we don't have internet IDs to add to the group. Otherwise, there is already a handy ability to expire the authorization on a certain date and it is per file, so pretty nifty otherwise! Your other suggestion of a neutral 3rd-party gives me pause because I'd like us, the IR, to be best choice for our affiliates' data so that we might compete with general purpose repositories like FigShare and Mendeley data, which apparently can handle the blind review process. Our institutional repository should be just as sophisticated as these third party services - if not more since we have the burden of long-term stewardship according to local research data ownership and retention policy -- and the first choice for our researchers when depositing their data for public access. Lisa On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Reed, Marianne A. <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: If you are using a version of DSpace that allows authorization policies for items, you could add the reviewer’s account to a Group that has access (or create a Group just for that reviewer) and grant Read access for the item to that group in the item’s Authorization policies. After the peer review was over, you’d probably want to remove that access. I think that the solution to this may be easiest outside of DSpace. If the journal is managing the peer review of the manuscript, could they also manage the peer review of the dataset? Or, if the file was given to a neutral third party, the third party could give the dataset to the reviewer. -- Marianne Marianne Reed Digital Initiatives Coordinator 450 Watson Library University of Kansas Libraries [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 785-864-8913<tel:785-864-8913> From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Lisa Johnston Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 4:28 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [dspace-community] Blind peer review in dspace Hi all, Question for the group: Has anyone had/resolved the use case of blind peer reviewer access to items that are embargoed under request a copy? We have recently encountered this issue with our data repository (http://z.umn.edu/DRUM) which is open access, but allows for up to 2 year embargo on files (using request a copy). In a few instances a researcher asked if we could allow for blind peer review to a dataset because it is associated with a manuscript submitted for a journal. This idea of "confidential peer-review" is also a requirement for depositing data associated with data papers in Nature Scientific Data. (See conditions for Institutional and project-specific repositories at http://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories) Under normal (non-embargoed) circumstances, there is no problem for anyone (reviewer or not) to anonymously access the files. But, in the case of an unaccepted manuscript, the researcher is holding off on releasing the data openly until the paper is accepted for publication. Therefore, when they upload the dataset with request a copy enabled, they run the potential of breaking the "blindness" when the reviewer requests access to the dataset (since all requests go to the submitter). Any suggestions for a way around this - technical or otherwise? Note that double blind is not the need here, just single blind that keeps the reviewer anonymous. Also note: For DRUM, only institutional affiliates are allowed to register to our repository as epeople. The reviewers will almost always come from outside the institution. Thanks for your collective wisdom! Lisa -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lisa Johnston Research Data Management/Curation Lead and Co-Director of the University Digital Conservancy University of Minnesota Libraries 108 Walter Library, Minneapolis, MN 55455 Hangouts: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> / Skype: ifylawwt http://lib.umn.edu/datamanagement | http://conservancy.umn.edu ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6908-9240 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DSpace Community" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/dspace-community. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lisa Johnston Research Data Management/Curation Lead and Co-Director of the University Digital Conservancy University of Minnesota Libraries 108 Walter Library, Minneapolis, MN 55455 Hangouts: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> / Skype: ifylawwt http://lib.umn.edu/datamanagement | http://conservancy.umn.edu ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6908-9240
-- Claudia Juergen Eldorado Technische Universität Dortmund Universitätsbibliothek Vogelpothsweg 76 44227 Dortmund Tel.: +49 231-755 40 43 Fax: +49 231-755 40 32 [email protected] www.ub.tu-dortmund.de Wichtiger Hinweis: Die Information in dieser E-Mail ist vertraulich. Sie ist ausschließlich für den Adressaten bestimmt. Sollten Sie nicht der für diese E-Mail bestimmte Adressat sein, unterrichten Sie bitte den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Vielen Dank. Unbeschadet der Korrespondenz per E-Mail, sind unsere Erklärungen ausschließlich final rechtsverbindlich, wenn sie in herkömmlicher Schriftform (mit eigenhändiger Unterschrift) oder durch Übermittlung eines solchen Schriftstücks per Telefax erfolgen. Important note: The information included in this e-mail is confidential. It is solely intended for the recipient. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail please contact the sender and delete this message. Thank you. Without prejudice of e-mail correspondence, our statements are only legally binding when they are made in the conventional written form (with personal signature) or when such documents are sent by fax. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DSpace Community" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/dspace-community. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
