For us, the external harvesters we care about all use OAI-PMH. So for that 
purpose, we can use any schema/combination of schemas we like in DSpace itself 
(we’ve got a mix of dc, thesis, a schema from our CRIS, and a local schema for 
miscellaneous fields we wanted to store…), we just transform it using xsl rules 
to whatever we want the harvesters to pick up. You can even use multiple 
contexts and/or metadata formats if different harvesters have different 
preferences.

Deborah

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On 
Behalf Of Peter
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2024 10:56 PM
To: DSpace Community <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [dspace-community] Switching from "dc" to "dcterms" in DSpace

You don't often get email from [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. 
Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>

Caution: This email originated from outside our organisation. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 
is safe.

Do you think it makes sense to use dc terms (but still, only standard 
qualifiers) for basic metadata just to avoid braking DSpace and then dcterms 
namespace (again, official set) for extending metadata? Can it negatively 
impact the "harvesting" tools? I'm curious if anyone has any experience from 
this perspective.

Peter

wtorek, 9 kwietnia 2024 o 14:38:39 UTC+1 Baer,Helen napisał(a):
Hi Peter,

I hear you about the unauthorized DC qualifiers that are in the DC namespace. 
We had been using some of them in our repository, and for the most part I ended 
their use a couple of years ago. I tried deleting a few of these elements and 
it caused problems for our developers because as Jorge and Tim explained, some 
of those elements are hard-coded into DSpace.

Best,

Helen
________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of 
Peter <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 4:56 AM

To: DSpace Community <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [dspace-community] Switching from "dc" to "dcterms" in DSpace


** Caution: EXTERNAL Sender **
Hello,

Thank you all for your interest in the topic and for your insights so far. It 
looks like transition to dcterms is less straightforward than expected.

The reason behind this issue is that I would prefer to stick with official DCMI 
namespaces<https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/> 
only. DSpace introduces many unofficial elements, and although I presume they 
are well established already, this is difficult to determine whether they will 
be correctly recognized by increasingly abundant external tools. I wouldn't 
mind using dc namespace, but dcterms has broader scope, so this is why I 
thought I would focus on this set of terms at first. However, attempting to 
adjust our current metadata to fit a stricter dc scope could be worthwhile.

Best,
Peter

poniedziałek, 8 kwietnia 2024 o 21:33:11 UTC+1 Reed, Marianne A. napisał(a):

Peter, could you please share why your institution wants to switch to “dcterms” 
instead of “dc” ?  I’m curious about the use case for this.



If you prefer, feel free to email me directly rather than replying to the list.



Best,

Marianne



Marianne Reed (she/her/hers)

Digital Publishing & Repository Manager

Watson Library, Room 470-G

University of Kansas Libraries

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

785-864-8913<tel:(785)%20864-8913>



From: DSpace Community 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Monday, April 8, 2024 3:02 PM
To: DSpace Community 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [dspace-community] Switching from "dc" to "dcterms" in DSpace



Hi Peter,

I can verify that what Jorge says is true.  DSpace's User Interface (not only 
in 6.x, but also in 7.x) assumes you are using "dc" fields.  While it's not 
*impossible* to make the switch to "dcterms", I suspect it'd take a lot of 
effort to make it happen.  DSpace has always relied on the existence of many 
key "dc" fields for title, author, descriptions, etc.  To remove all those 
hardcoded assumptions would be a lot of work. If you still want to do it, your 
first step may be to search the codebase and configuration of any hardcoded 
references to "dc.*" fields, and replace them with "dcterms.*" equivalents.



Tim

On Monday, April 8, 2024 at 9:56:42 AM UTC-5 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

Hello everyone,



In my opinion it would be a problem to make that change.

I think that several functionalities linked to specific dc fields would be 
affected.



Your idea is very interesting, but doing it en masse would involve 
reconditioning several elements in configurations in my opinion. In addition to 
reconditioning the worksheet, which would be the least important thing in this 
case.



I only recommend it if you have significant knowledge or assistance, and in a 
trial instance.



Greetings,

Jorge



El dom, 31 mar 2024 a las 9:44, Peter 
(<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>) escribió:

Hello,



We are considering switching from "dc" to "dcterms" namespace in our repository.



Is it technically possible without breaking any DSpace core functionality?



Although we do not use the newest DSpace version yet, but we are getting ready 
to update to one, so I would be interested to find out how would the newest 
versions handle this.



Tested replacing dc namespace with their equivalents in dcterms, and at least 
in DSpace 6 this results in disappearance of some data from landing page, but 
more important would be whether this is only a visual effect or the result of a 
more serious fault?



Thank you.

Peter



--
All messages to this mailing list should adhere to the Code of Conduct: 
https://www.lyrasis.org/about/Pages/Code-of-Conduct.aspx
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"DSpace Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dspace-community/e9ce1719-5125-4c81-b0e2-b6f4efb3b68fn%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dspace-community/e9ce1719-5125-4c81-b0e2-b6f4efb3b68fn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
All messages to this mailing list should adhere to the Code of Conduct: 
https://www.lyrasis.org/about/Pages/Code-of-Conduct.aspx
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"DSpace Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.

To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dspace-community/c8929405-72fa-411d-8d62-165f94b56689n%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dspace-community/c8929405-72fa-411d-8d62-165f94b56689n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
All messages to this mailing list should adhere to the Code of Conduct: 
https://www.lyrasis.org/about/Pages/Code-of-Conduct.aspx
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"DSpace Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dspace-community/5a587f0f-b73c-4d40-99cd-78addd65a9a2n%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dspace-community/5a587f0f-b73c-4d40-99cd-78addd65a9a2n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
All messages to this mailing list should adhere to the Code of Conduct: 
https://www.lyrasis.org/about/Pages/Code-of-Conduct.aspx
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"DSpace Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dspace-community/67f6ede5-7aa9-4f39-b859-67fdc1c57fcbn%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dspace-community/67f6ede5-7aa9-4f39-b859-67fdc1c57fcbn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

________________________________

"The contents of this e-mail (including any attachments) may be confidential 
and/or subject to copyright. Any unauthorised use, distribution, or copying of 
the contents is expressly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in 
error, please advise the sender by return e-mail or telephone and then delete 
this e-mail together with all attachments from your system."

-- 
All messages to this mailing list should adhere to the Code of Conduct: 
https://www.lyrasis.org/about/Pages/Code-of-Conduct.aspx
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"DSpace Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dspace-community/ME3PR01MB75242B3200E050A3E0875B5AC5052%40ME3PR01MB7524.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com.

Reply via email to