Maybe future DSpace releases could include UI tool which would allow for a 
"schema to interface" (and other modules if necessary) items mapping? I 
imagine this could make DSpace more flexible in terms of schemas used. I 
found a similar tool while setting up collections in WorldCat Digital 
Collection Gateway.

Anyway, thank you all for your valuable comments.

Peter
piątek, 12 kwietnia 2024 o 19:10:36 UTC+1 Jorge Gustavo Spertino napisał(a):

> Hello, 
> I have read the contributions of all the participants and it has been very 
> valuable, thank you. 
> I have seen many of my thoughts reflected. I just want to restate 
> something that Deborah mentioned. 
> Many of us who use DSpace are or aspire to be harvested or to harvest as 
> the case may be. In this sense, it may be important to take into account 
> the OAI-PMH protocol. 
> If you have the knowledge and dedication to carry out the mappings that 
> Deborah refers to, such a situation can be resolved, otherwise, in my 
> opinion, it would not be too advisable to deviate from dc, at least from 
> the basic core, to guarantee a semi-direct passage.
>
> Best,
> Jorge
>
> El mié, 10 abr 2024 a las 21:09, Fitchett, Deborah (<
> [email protected]>) escribió:
>
>> For us, the external harvesters we care about all use OAI-PMH. So for 
>> that purpose, we can use any schema/combination of schemas we like in 
>> DSpace itself (we’ve got a mix of dc, thesis, a schema from our CRIS, and a 
>> local schema for miscellaneous fields we wanted to store…), we just 
>> transform it using xsl rules to whatever we want the harvesters to pick up. 
>> You can even use multiple contexts and/or metadata formats if different 
>> harvesters have different preferences.
>>
>>  
>>
>> Deborah
>>
>>  
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] <[email protected]> *On 
>> Behalf Of *Peter
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 10, 2024 10:56 PM
>> *To:* DSpace Community <[email protected]>
>> *Subject:* Re: [dspace-community] Switching from "dc" to "dcterms" in 
>> DSpace
>>
>>  
>>
>> You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is 
>> important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
>>
>>  
>>
>> *Caution:* This email originated from outside our organisation. Do not 
>> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know 
>> the content is safe.
>>
>>  
>>
>> Do you think it makes sense to use dc terms (but still, only standard 
>> qualifiers) for basic metadata just to avoid braking DSpace and then 
>> dcterms namespace (again, official set) for extending metadata? Can it 
>> negatively impact the "harvesting" tools? I'm curious if anyone has any 
>> experience from this perspective.
>>
>>  
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>  
>>
>> wtorek, 9 kwietnia 2024 o 14:38:39 UTC+1 Baer,Helen napisał(a):
>>
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>>  
>>
>> I hear you about the unauthorized DC qualifiers that are in the DC 
>> namespace. We had been using some of them in our repository, and for the 
>> most part I ended their use a couple of years ago. I tried deleting a few 
>> of these elements and it caused problems for our developers because as 
>> Jorge and Tim explained, some of those elements are hard-coded into DSpace.
>>
>>  
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>  
>>
>> Helen
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] <[email protected]> on 
>> behalf of Peter <[email protected]>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 9, 2024 4:56 AM
>>
>>
>> *To:* DSpace Community <[email protected]>
>> *Subject:* Re: [dspace-community] Switching from "dc" to "dcterms" in 
>> DSpace
>>
>>  
>>
>> *** Caution: EXTERNAL Sender ***
>>
>> Hello, 
>>
>>  
>>
>> Thank you all for your interest in the topic and for your insights so 
>> far. It looks like transition to dcterms is less straightforward than 
>> expected.
>>
>>  
>>
>> The reason behind this issue is that I would prefer to stick with official 
>> DCMI namespaces 
>> <https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/> only. 
>> DSpace introduces many unofficial elements, and although I presume they are 
>> well established already, this is difficult to determine whether they will 
>> be correctly recognized by increasingly abundant external tools. I wouldn't 
>> mind using dc namespace, but dcterms has broader scope, so this is why I 
>> thought I would focus on this set of terms at first. However, attempting to 
>> adjust our current metadata to fit a stricter dc scope could be worthwhile.
>>
>>  
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>  
>>
>> poniedziałek, 8 kwietnia 2024 o 21:33:11 UTC+1 Reed, Marianne A. 
>> napisał(a):
>>
>> Peter, could you please share why your institution wants to switch to 
>> “dcterms” instead of “dc” ?  I’m curious about the use case for this.  
>>
>>  
>>
>> If you prefer, feel free to email me directly rather than replying to the 
>> list.
>>
>>  
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Marianne
>>
>>  
>>
>> Marianne Reed (she/her/hers*)*
>>
>> Digital Publishing & Repository Manager
>>
>> Watson Library, Room 470-G
>>
>> University of Kansas Libraries
>>
>> [email protected]
>>
>> 785-864-8913 <(785)%20864-8913>
>>
>>  
>>
>> *From:* DSpace Community <[email protected]> 
>> *Sent:* Monday, April 8, 2024 3:02 PM
>> *To:* DSpace Community <[email protected]>
>> *Subject:* Re: [dspace-community] Switching from "dc" to "dcterms" in 
>> DSpace
>>
>>  
>>
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>>
>> I can verify that what Jorge says is true.  DSpace's User Interface (not 
>> only in 6.x, but also in 7.x) assumes you are using "dc" fields.  While 
>> it's not *impossible* to make the switch to "dcterms", I suspect it'd take 
>> a lot of effort to make it happen.  DSpace has always relied on the 
>> existence of many key "dc" fields for title, author, descriptions, etc.  To 
>> remove all those hardcoded assumptions would be a lot of work. If you still 
>> want to do it, your first step may be to search the codebase and 
>> configuration of any hardcoded references to "dc.*" fields, and replace 
>> them with "dcterms.*" equivalents.
>>
>>  
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> On Monday, April 8, 2024 at 9:56:42 AM UTC-5 [email protected] wrote:
>>
>> Hello everyone, 
>>
>>  
>>
>> In my opinion it would be a problem to make that change. 
>>
>> I think that several functionalities linked to specific dc fields would 
>> be affected. 
>>
>>  
>>
>> Your idea is very interesting, but doing it en masse would involve 
>> reconditioning several elements in configurations in my opinion. In 
>> addition to reconditioning the worksheet, which would be the least 
>> important thing in this case.
>>
>>  
>>
>> I only recommend it if you have significant knowledge or assistance, and 
>> in a trial instance. 
>>
>>  
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Jorge
>>
>>  
>>
>> El dom, 31 mar 2024 a las 9:44, Peter (<[email protected]>) escribió:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>  
>>
>> We are considering switching from "dc" to "dcterms" namespace in our 
>> repository.
>>
>>  
>>
>> Is it technically possible without breaking any DSpace core functionality?
>>
>>  
>>
>> Although we do not use the newest DSpace version yet, but we are getting 
>> ready to update to one, so I would be interested to find out how would the 
>> newest versions handle this.
>>
>>  
>>
>> Tested replacing dc namespace with their equivalents in dcterms, and at 
>> least in DSpace 6 this results in disappearance of some data from landing 
>> page, but more important would be whether this is only a visual effect or 
>> the result of a more serious fault?
>>
>>  
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>  
>>
>> -- 
>> All messages to this mailing list should adhere to the Code of Conduct: 
>> https://www.lyrasis.org/about/Pages/Code-of-Conduct.aspx
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "DSpace Community" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dspace-community/e9ce1719-5125-4c81-b0e2-b6f4efb3b68fn%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dspace-community/e9ce1719-5125-4c81-b0e2-b6f4efb3b68fn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> -- 
>> All messages to this mailing list should adhere to the Code of Conduct: 
>> https://www.lyrasis.org/about/Pages/Code-of-Conduct.aspx
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "DSpace Community" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>>
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dspace-community/c8929405-72fa-411d-8d62-165f94b56689n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dspace-community/c8929405-72fa-411d-8d62-165f94b56689n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> -- 
>> All messages to this mailing list should adhere to the Code of Conduct: 
>> https://www.lyrasis.org/about/Pages/Code-of-Conduct.aspx
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "DSpace Community" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>>
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dspace-community/5a587f0f-b73c-4d40-99cd-78addd65a9a2n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dspace-community/5a587f0f-b73c-4d40-99cd-78addd65a9a2n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> -- 
>> All messages to this mailing list should adhere to the Code of Conduct: 
>> https://www.lyrasis.org/about/Pages/Code-of-Conduct.aspx
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "DSpace Community" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dspace-community/67f6ede5-7aa9-4f39-b859-67fdc1c57fcbn%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dspace-community/67f6ede5-7aa9-4f39-b859-67fdc1c57fcbn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> "The contents of this e-mail (including any attachments) may be 
>> confidential and/or subject to copyright. Any unauthorised use, 
>> distribution, or copying of the contents is expressly prohibited. If you 
>> have received this e-mail in error, please advise the sender by return 
>> e-mail or telephone and then delete this e-mail together with all 
>> attachments from your system." 
>>
>> -- 
>> All messages to this mailing list should adhere to the Code of Conduct: 
>> https://www.lyrasis.org/about/Pages/Code-of-Conduct.aspx
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "DSpace Community" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dspace-community/ME3PR01MB75242B3200E050A3E0875B5AC5052%40ME3PR01MB7524.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dspace-community/ME3PR01MB75242B3200E050A3E0875B5AC5052%40ME3PR01MB7524.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
All messages to this mailing list should adhere to the Code of Conduct: 
https://www.lyrasis.org/about/Pages/Code-of-Conduct.aspx
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"DSpace Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dspace-community/045b08bb-eac2-4f9c-aea8-53bad1b0ebb7n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to