On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:51 AM, helix84 <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Mark Diggory <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> https://github.com/DSpace/DSpace/blob/master/dspace-xmlui/dspace-xmlui-webapp/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/web.xml#L37
> >
> > I consider myself as the major proponent of switching to use dspace.dir
> > rather than a direct reference to the config file. I now see it is too
> much
> > of a transition for the community to absorb and reverse my opinion...
>
> I support this as well. It seems like an obvious choice since we've
> had config/modules, no?
>
Ivan, yes, config/modules is supported in the ConfigurationService already,
its just the the selection was relative the dspace.dir handed via the
environment, not the one found in the dspace.cfg. Now it would just be
based on the dspace.dir identified in the dspace.cfg, which is the same
behavior as ConfigurationManager, this will make it even easier to stub
out ConfigurationManager so that its using the preexisting
ConfigurationService for its calls and we end up with one common solution
going forward.
Mark
--
[image: @mire Inc.]
*Mark Diggory *(Schedule a Meeting <https://tungle.me/markdiggory>)
*2888 Loker Avenue East, Suite 305, Carlsbad, CA. 92010*
*Esperantolaan 4, Heverlee 3001, Belgium*
http://www.atmire.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Dspace-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-devel
