Title: Message Title
|
|
Hi Tim, thanks for your answer. Actually, my concerns are not for the technical aspect of the implementation. We have implemented this in previous dspace installation (1.8.0) by adding extra fields in bistream table and changing the code when needed.(e.g. http://helios-eie.ekt.gr/EIE/handle/10442/13187?locale=en). I am asking for the input of the community regarding the usability of such case. Is there a point (maybe and from the legal prespective) to add a license to the bitstream level rather the item level or to both levels (different license for the metadata and different for bitstream)? I mean have you heard this request for other repositories? Thank you again! Rania
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
_______________________________________________
Dspace-devel mailing list
Dspace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-devel