Graham,

Thank you for your feedback and analysis of pros and cons.

Pros (as I see it): faculty will receive a regular reminder about the 
repository.  In our case, depositors are librarians. We deposit on faculty 
behalf; no chicken and egg situation, but faculty involvement is low.
Cons: bad usage statistics.  Sure, we do not want to report to faculty zero 
hits. Is it really possible to have zero usage? If usage is low, the reports 
may be scheduled to send bi-monthly, or even 3-4 times per year. If the reports 
will go to depositors (=librarians), "bad news" reports can be filtered.

Administration do not ask our faculty for information on usage of their works 
posted online, so no request for such reports from faculty (and no needs for 
them to visit the repository).

In any cases, manual distribution of selected statistics to faculty seems as a 
good alternative to start with.


At the best
Susan


__________________________
Susan Matveyeva, PhD, MLIS, B.Mus
Associate Professor, Catalog &
Institutional Repository Librarian
Wichita State University Libraries
1845 Fairmount, Wichita, KS 67260-0068

Office: (316) 978-5139
Fax: (316) 978-3496
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://soar.wichita.edu




From: Graham Triggs [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 5:09 AM
To: Matveyeva, Susan
Cc: Platt, Alice; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Dspace-general] DSpace 1.7 discussion: Customizations

On 20 January 2011 19:24, Matveyeva, Susan 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi,

 Is it appropriate to discuss desirable new functionality here?  I am very 
interested in automated delivery of statistics of hits and downloads to our 
authors. Bepress Digital Commons has this feature.  The system sends monthly 
reports to the authors. Some our faculty mentioned to me how wonderful it would 
be to receive monthly email update from SOAR. Personally, I think that 
automated statistics delivery is the excellent tool to promote an institutional 
repository and to recruit content from authors.  I'd like to hear your opinion 
on this matter.  Would it be a good idea to develop similar functionality for 
DSpace?  Sorry if I jumped off the topic.


Hi,

I think that would depend on what you expect to get from having such a feature. 
If the goal is to have positive reinforcement about the use of content in the 
repository, then an automated email to authors (or depositor - it may not be 
feasible to email all of the authors, unless the contact details are an 
explicit part of submission), is going to report on whatever the stats are 
(well, whatever the system thinks they are!) whether that's good or bad. The 
number of accesses to repository deposits may depend on how well the deposit is 
publicised, whether the same content is available elsewhere, etc. What would be 
the reaction of depositors to receiving reports saying there were few downloads?

And it's a bit of a chicken and egg situation - an author needs to be 
depositing into the repository in order to get those reports. The promise that 
they will get the reports might encourage some, but there is no positive 
reinforcement for authors that haven't already deposited.

In both of those cases, it might be a better strategy to distribute [manually] 
selected statistics to the authors that you wish to encourage to use the 
repository. Highlighting the actual success stories, and maybe even encouraging 
a bit of a rivalry amongst the authors, might be more effective in not only 
encouraging deposits, but in having them advocate and publicise the repository 
as a place to access their content.

On the other hand, if there is active resistance to using the repository, 
because the authors need to be able to report on the usage - regardless of 
whether it's good or bad - then that would lean more towards the email of 
reports. Although it's not necessarily clear that scheduled reports would be of 
more use than providing ways for them to pull that information when they 
require it, and technically I would argue there are fewer complications to 
providing the means to pull that information, than to automatically distribute 
it.

Regards,
G
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free!
Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires 
February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Dspace-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-general

Reply via email to