Hi there,
We are working with an institution who recently ran a Bulk Access Control
job from the UI to add an item-level embargo for ~400 items in a
collection. The process ran successfully (completed with no errors -
screenshot attached) however only half of the items actually had the policy
applied.
Sample excerpt from the log file:
2025-06-12 15:03:10.803 INFO bulk-access-control - 170 @ Replacing Item
{UUID1} policy to access conditions:{embargo, start_date=2025-06-15}
2025-06-12 15:03:10.855 INFO bulk-access-control - 170 @ Replacing Item
{UUID2} policy to access conditions:{embargo, start_date=2025-06-15}
2025-06-12 15:03:10.900 INFO bulk-access-control - 170 @ Replacing Item
{UUID3} policy to access conditions:{embargo, start_date=2025-06-15}
2025-06-12 15:03:10.948 INFO bulk-access-control - 170 @ Replacing Item
{UUID4} policy to access conditions:{embargo, start_date=2025-06-15}
Reviewing the logs, only half of the UUIDs from the collection are in the
list. These items received the updated policy. The missing items did not.
Is there a reason or known issue why the process would miss half of the
items in the collection? Should we rerun the process to update the
remaining items?
Thanks very much,
Julia
--
All messages to this mailing list should adhere to the Code of Conduct:
https://www.lyrasis.org/about/Pages/Code-of-Conduct.aspx
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"DSpace Technical Support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dspace-tech/ab5a7af7-d6f2-4b49-8ce8-02c45594c8b0n%40googlegroups.com.
