Dear all,

When DSpace was conceived Dublin Core was placed at the heart of the
software. This resulted in nice tools characterised by their easy of use and
simplicity. In the past years many users struggled with this simplicity
(Andrea Bollini, Federico Meschini, DSpace: Evolution from an Intelligent
Design, DSUG Bergen, 2006 - Lieven Droogmans, Ben Bosman, Customizing DSpace
for a large research university, DSUG Bergen, 2006 - Susanna Mornati, Andrea
Bollini, New opportunities for Institutional Repositories: the evaluation
challenge. A case study DSUG 2007, Rome - PAUWELS Benoit, DISpace,
ULB-Brussels).

The submission module was kept very simple because of the simplicity of
Dublin Core. What at the beginning looked very attractive became very
quickly problematic. In our own University repository (Document
[EMAIL PROTECTED]) and in OceanDocs, we were confronted with bad formatted
metadata. This was first of all the case for the identifier.citation field.
Submitters need a better structure to enter the metadata. Also, the
crosswalk tool is very nice, but with more granular data available other OAI
metadata formats can be made better. Benoit Pauwels and his team at ULB,
Brussels did an interesting analyse of the metadata based on document type.
This analyse was used by us to customize DSpace for Document [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and OceanDocs.

But now we want to focus on the submission module of DSpace. We propose to
develop an alternative submission module extending the possibilities of the
actual one. We can define three parts which can be developed separately:
1. A flexible framework: This is our first  target (see further)
2. Granularity of metadata: This item outreaches the submission module, but
has to be resolved too. DSpace has many advantages. One of them is the
easiness to add extra fields. But they are DC-defined (or at least on a
two-level basis). On the database level this is not relevant. It is only
important to have DC-formatted metadata on the level of the OAI-module.
People are solving this problem in different ways: Agris DSpace rewrites the
code to use the language element, people are using extra fields. I have seen
dc.citation.title etc., we use dc.bibliographicCitation.title etc. There is
also the problem of one-to-one relations (e.g; author and unique ID). A
standardized approach should be preferable. 
3. Submitters support: The Thesaurus add-on is already available. The Agris
DSpace group will work on extending the functionality and on other types of
authority control: author names - serials - ... We will participate in this
development too.

A flexible framework:

The DSpace submission module is limited but at the same time has already
many interesting features. The metadata pages can be adapted and new ones
can be added. The field choices and presentation can be customized. Also I
understand that in version 1.5 the steps can even be better defined. But I
still miss the adaptability of the metadata pages and some extra formatting
options. 

The actual steps in DSpace are as follows:
1. Initial questions
2. Metadata pages
3. Upload
4. Verify
5. Creative Commons (optional)
6. License Agreement

We propose the following model:
1. Metadata pages (with the possibility to create in one page the option of
different templates (with tabs)
2. Upload (with the possibility to add multiple files)
3. Verify
4. Creative Commons (optional)
5. License Agreement

This framework can be used for the classical DSpace but also if you want to
refine your metadata and add extra functionality (authority control).

We already developed a submission procedure based on document type for
DSpace 1.4 (See Annex 1). Basically, we only extended the functionality of
the submission part of DSpace 1.4.x. We want to port this approach, (refined
and not only type-based) to version 1.5 as a plug-in or as an alternative
module.

See for more information at:
http://www.uhasselt.be/bibliotheek/dspace/dspace.htm

We like to receive comments and suggestions on this proposal. Also if people
are interested to cooperate or to test out our developments, they are always
welcome.

Regards

Denys Slipetskyy, Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas, Sevastopol,
Ukraine - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marc Goovaerts, Hasselt University, Belgium - [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
DSpace-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech

Reply via email to