Actually, 8.2 went EOL at the end of last year, so it wouldn't hurt to make the official 'requirements' be at least 8.3, even if 8.2 happens to work.
For the next release, I would even be tempted to say that the official minimum is 8.4 (it's already highly recommended). It may work with 8.3 / 8.2, but 8.3 will be EOL before the following major DSpace release, so it would be prudent for people to be on at least 8.4 anyway, with a recommendation for 9 and above. G On 14 June 2012 23:13, helix84 <heli...@centrum.sk> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Mark H. Wood <mw...@iupui.edu> wrote: >> We've been using 9.0 in production with DSpace 1.7.2 for some months, >> without incident. Time to update requirements? > > Glad to hear that, we should mention that in docs. But I don't think > we should bump up _requirements_. > > Regards, > ~~helix84 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > DSpace-tech mailing list > DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
