M2CW

After using Fedora for a number of years I have found the strict Dspace model 
hard work.
Although there are plenty of issues with using triple stores and RDF based 
systems for representing structural relationships IMHO the benefits are worth 
it.

Regards,
        Ben

------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Ben Ryan
Jorum Technical Manager

5.12 Roscoe Building
The University of Manchester
Oxford Road
Manchester
M13 9PL
Tel: 0160 275 6039
E-mail: [email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: helix84 [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 19 November 2012 14:30
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Dspace-tech] dspace 1.8.2, xmlui, and the branded JPEG media 
filter

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Mark H. Wood <[email protected]> wrote:
> That ever-lengthening list of hardwired tests seems to point to deeper 
> problems.  I'd like to suggest that the ultimate problem is that the 
> whole idea of Bundle is wrong.
>
> Containment is the wrong model.  Just about the only Bundle that will 
> ever contain more than one Bitstream is ORIGINAL.  Things like TEXT 
> and THUMBNAIL are really class-membership flags, and ORIGINAL can be 
> seen that way too.
>
> I think a more general solution would involve abolishing Bundle and 
> describing the Bitstream more directly.  It could use simple flags:
> when extracting flat text, for example, give it the DERIVED flag and 
> the TEXT flag.  Or it could be done with valued attributes: this 
> Bitstream has DERIVATIVE("TEXT").  Or it could be a complex set of RDF 
> objects with relationships going off in *all* directions.  This 
> probably needs some debate.

I agree that I never liked the concept of bundle very much, mostly because of 
the minor annoyance of yet another natural join when writing SQL queries. OTOH, 
I know people who depend on the concept with their extensions of DSpace. So it 
would be highly desirable to preserve backward compatibility at least on the 
API level.

But I like the idea of items directly containing bitstreams and their relations 
being described in another way.

The possibilities of storing RDF in a SQL database also seem to be well 
explored:
http://infolab.stanford.edu/~melnik/rdf/db.html


Regards,
~~helix84

Compulsory reading: DSpace Mailing List Etiquette 
https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web 
console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud 
infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
_______________________________________________
DSpace-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
_______________________________________________
DSpace-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech

Reply via email to