I have detected a misfeature which makes a single spam-reporting alias
fail for some users. I have configured my dspam as per the README-file
so that missed spam messages eventually gets fed to:
dspam --user root --class=spam --source=error
I am running with virtual users and have made sure that root exists in
the virtual users table.
The problem is that dspam fails to find the signature for certain users.
I did some debugging and found out why. Default on my system is to place
the signature in the body of the message, but the problem users have
changed this to place the signature in the header. But the above run
will use the preferences of 'root' when looking for the signature so
find_signature() in dspam.c will only look in the body of the message.
Therefore it does not find the signature.
I can see a couple of possible solutions. Either we change
find_signature to always look in both header and body, or we can
implement a new value "both" to signatureLocation which makes it look at
both places.
/MaF
