On Wednesday 06 May 2009 23:59:33 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > > > (As a note, I don't remember ever deciding this.) > > > > I don't love (read hate) auto*, but ATM the seems to be OK for dspam. > > > > I'm not opposed to switching to cmake or something else, but: > > - I'd like to see a comparison between various tools, from our > > project's POV, keeping in mind that we need to support a lot of > > OSes. > > - I'd like a commitment from someone that it will maintain the > > configure system and handle bugs on all supported OSes (this implies > > more that just the initial switch, it implies having both desire and > > _time_ to maintain it). > > - I'd like that someone to be available help us (dspam developers) to > > learn said configure system. > > Ping :-)
I'm currently working on other projects and code, so I have now time at the moment...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________ Dspam-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel
