Stevan Bajic' wrote: > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:11:31 +0000 > Paul Cockings <ds...@cytringan.co.uk> wrote: > > >> Why do we have two options for clamav? >> >> CLAMAV >> CLAMAV_DEVEL >> >> > We don't have that: > # grep -r CLAMAV ./dspam > ./dspam/configure.ac: AC_DEFINE(CLAMAV, 1, [Defined if clamav is enabled]) > ./dspam/src/dspam.c:#ifdef CLAMAV > ./dspam/src/dspam.c:#ifdef CLAMAV > ./dspam/src/dspam.c:#ifdef CLAMAV > ./dspam/src/dspam.c:#ifdef CLAMAV > ./dspam/src/dspam.h:#ifdef CLAMAV > # > > Ok, must be the freebsd port makefile doing odd stuff
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Dspam-devel mailing list Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel