On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:43:03 +0000 Paul Cockings <ds...@cytringan.co.uk> wrote:
> Stevan Bajic' wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:11:31 +0000 > > Paul Cockings <ds...@cytringan.co.uk> wrote: > > > >> Why do we have two options for clamav? > >> > >> CLAMAV > >> CLAMAV_DEVEL > >> > >> > > We don't have that: > Ok, must be the freebsd port makefile doing odd stuff It's not odd, they are purely options to the port, not options to the dspam build. The fact that dspam uses a CLAMAV define is purely coincidental, the port passes --enable-clamav to "configure" to enable clam support. The difference between the two is the version of clamav that gets installed as a dependency. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Dspam-devel mailing list Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel
