On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 14:07:34 +0200 Tom Hendrikx <t...@whyscream.net> wrote:
> On 08/08/10 17:57, Stevan Bajić wrote: > > On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 15:52:58 +0200 > > Tom Hendrikx <t...@whyscream.net> wrote: > > > > [...] > >>> > >>> # cat /var/spool/dspam/group.away > >>> groupname:classification:*classicifation_user > >>> > >>>> Could you post the output of "select * from dspam_virtual_uids where > >>>> username = 'classification_user'"? > >>> > >>> vmail=# select * from dspam_virtual_uids; > >>> uid | username > >>> -----+------------------------ > >>> 1 | classification_user > >>> 2 | tomhe...@example.com > >>> (2 rows) > >>> > >> > >> And a few minutes after sending the mail, I thought that I might have > >> made a typo. And I did: classification_user != classicifation_user > >> > > Good catch. > > > > > >> Sorry for the noise. However, I still think that an error message > >> explaining the issue would help a lot. > >> > >> Error: processing message for user tomhe...@example.com failed: unable > >> to find user 'classicifation_user' for peer classification. > >> > >> looks so much better than: > >> > >> bailing on error -2 > >> process_message returned error -5. delivering. > >> > > You are right. The error message could be better. However... it's not that > > simple. I anyway need to change the whole code for better error handling in > > case of non existing users. > > > > Could you try the attached patch? It will not print out the error message > > you requested but should work better in cases when > > ensure_confident_result() is returning a wrong result. > > > > Could you send me a new debug output with the applied patch? > > New debug output attached. > > According to the debug file, a valid signature is generated, which is > good. Unfortunately, it is not added to the database, and the message is > not delivered to the user. > > Postfix says in the DSN back to the sender: > > <tomhe...@example.com> (expanded from <t...@example.com>): Command died with > signal 11: "/usr/bin/dspam" > Uhhh... a segmentation fault. Geee! That is in no way good! > So this is actually a worse situation:) > Yes! Worse then before. > Regards, > Tom -- Kind Regards from Switzerland, Stevan Bajić ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Dspam-devel mailing list Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel
