On 07/08/10 14:58, Stevan Bajić wrote: > On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 14:44:00 +0200 > Tom Hendrikx <t...@whyscream.net> wrote: > >> Hi, >> > Hallo Tom, > >> After upgrading to 3.9.1-rc (and later git HEAD), I noticed lots of >> errors in my logging: >> >> 2010-08-07T14:13:08+02:00 vmail dspam[13054]: bailing on error -2 >> 2010-08-07T14:13:08+02:00 vmail dspam[13054]: process_message returned >> error -5. delivering. >> >> When this started, headers were also no longer added to the delivered >> messages. After some debugging I found this in the debug log: >> >> 13054: [08/07/2010 14:13:08] _pgsql_drv_getpwnam: returning NULL for >> query on name: classicifation_user that returned a null result >> 13054: [08/07/2010 14:13:08] _ds_getall_spamrecords: unable to >> _pgsql_drv_getpwnam(classicifation_user) >> 13054: [08/07/2010 14:13:08] _ds_getall_spamrecords() failed >> 13054: [08/07/2010 14:13:08] user_classify() returned error -5 >> 13054: [08/07/2010 14:13:08] destroying/freeing configuration >> 13054: [08/07/2010 14:13:08] _pgsql_drv_getpwnam returning cached name >> tomhe...@example.net. >> 13054: [08/07/2010 14:13:08] destroying/freeing configuration >> >> classification_user was in my intial setup intended to contain 'global >> classification' data, but I never got started to merging stuff into it. >> The user exists in the pgsql backend (dspam_virtual_uids), but has no >> training data there. >> >> DSPAM 3.9.0 did not have any problems with this empty user. >> > DSPAM 3.9.0 had totally messed up and wrong working group support. We got > that fixed: > > http://dspam.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=dspam/dspam;a=commit;h=22714e4f390d48187777b14e7585ede4d180c376 > > http://dspam.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=dspam/dspam;a=commit;h=80b89d634481fa2eca17a6666f67e6d0117b76f8 >
Didn't know that it was broken, as I got never around to testing it.
Great :)
>
>
>> I fixed the
>> issue for now, by removing the group file.
>>
>> When I have some new training data, I'll also try merging this back to
>> the classification user and see if it solves the issue.
>>
> You need to have a valid user. Else it will not work.
That is no reason for spitting out an uninformal error message, and
abort processing. DSPAM should still process the message, but without
using the data from the classification user.
--
Regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Dspam-devel mailing list Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel
