On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 15:57:47 +0200
Elias Oltmanns <e...@nebensachen.de> wrote:
> Elias Oltmanns <e...@nebensachen.de> wrote:
> > ---
> > src/libdspam.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Apparently, this one made it into git, but ...
>
> > diff --git a/src/libdspam.c b/src/libdspam.c index 5d83113..8f6bab7
> > 100644 --- a/src/libdspam.c +++ b/src/libdspam.c
> [...]
> > @@ -1192,7 +1192,7 @@ _ds_process_signature (DSPAM_CTX * CTX)
> >
> > LOGDEBUG ("processing signature. length: %ld", CTX->signature->length);
> >
> > - CTX->result = DSS_NONE;
> > + CTX->result = DSR_NONE;
> >
> > if (!(CTX->flags & DSF_UNLEARN))
> > CTX->learned = 1;
>
> ... is there a particular reason why this hunk did not get merged or
> was there just some hick up in the process.
>
No, no. No hickup. I do such patches usually by hand. One by one. And I need to
understand them before I apply them. And in the above case I have not processed
the whole patch so that is the reason that hunk has not managed to get into
GIT. But now it is there.
> Regards,
>
> Elias
>
--
Kind Regards from Switzerland,
Stevan Bajić
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Dspam-devel mailing list
Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel
