-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:32:15 +0100 > Von: "Jehan Pagès" <[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] spam_train does not work
> Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Steve <[email protected]> wrote: > > > btw: I do only SC/NC training over here. For that I have a modified > > training script doing the SC/NC training and doing TONE (train near on > on > > error). The result is that training now takes 1/2 up to 1/3 of normal > > training time and the data is way, way, way smaller then with normal > > training. Just the other week I helped another Gentoo user with training > of > > his DSPAM installation. Result was that he got down from 483.33M of data > > (normal training) down to 47.79M data. The training was slightly faster > but > > not so significant as on my setup (keep in mind that I have a > significantly > > rewritten storage driver for MySQL on one of my setups). > > Checking accuracy on a corpus he has never trained before resulted in > 99.x% > > and on another corpus it resulted in 98.x%. I am not 100% sure about the > > accuracy since I can not find his mail with the real numbers but I > remember > > one to be 99.9 something and the other > 98.5 something. Anyway... the > > accuracy was pretty high considering that he never has trained mails > from > > that corpus and considering that it was an very messy and error prone > corpus > > (spamarchive.org submit and autosubmit). > > > > Thanks for your offer, this looks very interesting and I will probably > come > back to it soon. I just have to deal another configuration issue first... > (see below) > > > > > > > But the training output looks > > > much > > > more interesting now! Not all messages are passing as non-spam as it > did > > > before (I had 0 true positive, now I have 478 of them!). > > > > > > So things look better, thanks very much! I will now wait a day or so > to > > > check that some spams are really caught and sent to the Junk/ folder > of > > my > > > mailbox as expected in my dspam configuration. If this works, I will > be > > > happy and report it here. > > > > So all was nearly good. Now dspam is trained (it could be better as you > said, but it is enough for my configuration tests) and it is tagging a lot > of my spams, with [SPAM] on the subject and in the header stuffs like > this: > > X-DSPAM-Result: Spam > X-DSPAM-Processed: Thu Feb 5 23:49:02 2009 > X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.5232 > X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.9869 > X-DSPAM-Signature: 498b6cde61901804284693 > X-DSPAM-Factors: 27, > Subject*watch, 0.99000, > a+loved, 0.99000, > Subject*for+all, 0.99000, > ... > ... > > But I wanted spam to go in my Junk folder (using maildir, this is the > directory .maildir/.Junk for my configuration. > As I copied in a previous email, I set my quarantine agent like this: > > QuarantineAgent "/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d %u -m Junk" > > But it doesn't look to work as my emails are still deliverd to INBOX. > I would like to check which agent is used with > spams and if the QuarantineAgent is indeed called. Depending on this, > I will be able to see if my issue is in dspam or dovecot. > Unfortunately I don't manage to get logs telling me this. > I tried with this, but it didn't show me anything interesting: > > Debug * > DebugOpt process spam fp > > I also tried to add some bash command to the QuarantineAgent ("echo > spam > /tmp/spam; /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d %u -m Junk") > , but this variable is not processed like in a shell apparently hence it > failed. > > Would you know how I could diagnose this? > This is more a dovecot issue then a DSPAM issue. Why it is not working in your setup I can not tell since I don't know what version of dovecot you are using and I have not overview of your dovecot configuration. Are you using namespaces in dovecot? Are you delivering to local or virtual users? Do you use lookups to query the home of the users? etc, etc, etc... all this is not known without you giving more information about your dovecot installation. However... you can post the stuff here but the better place would be the dovecot mailing list (I have seen you posting there. So you know where to ask). Have you considered using something like maildrop or sieve to filter mail into folders? It's way more flexible then doing it in DSPAM directly. Just as a side note. > Thanks. > > Jehan > Steve -- Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM) software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and code to build responsive, highly engaging applications that combine the power of local resources and data with the reach of the web. Download the Adobe AIR SDK and Ajax docs to start building applications today-http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-com _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
