Hallo, > Okay 2 vs. 1 ... stupid idea. But you really mean a message where dspam > say > is it 100% probability and 100% confidence spam it can be ham? And it make > no sense to have different action on spams? > Yep! Or tell me that you never have with 100% confidence (and 100% probability) said that something is XYZ and then later someone proved to you that it is not XYZ but ABC. No one is perfect. NEVER! And language is a very dynamic field and even the best of the best can make errors. Take that possibility and combine that with the possibility that the message in question could have been a super-duper contract for you resulting in a secured income for the next 5 years or that the message in question was something you really, really needed/wanted and that you have lost it because some stupid anti-spam filter (DSPAM) said it has a 100% confidence and a 100% probability that it is SPAM. Would you want that?
> Sebastian > Steve -- Neu: GMX Doppel-FLAT mit Internet-Flatrate + Telefon-Flatrate für nur 19,99 Euro/mtl.!* http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
