Em Sex, 2009-12-11 às 16:01 +0100, Stevan Bajić escreveu: > Hallo all,
Hello Stevan > > some days ago Paul has posted on the developer mailing list asking for a > possibility to delegate the management of certain users/domains to other > users then administrator. > > As usual I could not sit on my mouth and said that one could wrap the current > Web UI to allow something like that. > > We talked then about how to do that and and and... > > ... to make the story short: The other day I have quickly wrapped the current > DSPAM Web UI to use Dojo toolkit (http://www.dojotoolkit.org/) and to display > the various pages inside a tabbed content layout. The initial hacking was > done in 15 to 20 minutes. But then I took me more time to hack > dspam.cgi/admin.cgi to be flexible enough for the new way of rendering the > various pages. > > I have included some screen shots so that you can see how it looks like. > Basically it's the same Web UI as we currently have (with small code fixes > that soon will appear in stock DSPAM as well) plus some additional functions > (the one Paul needed/wanted) and a nice and sexy GUI with visual effects like > one finds for example in Dojo Mail -> > http://demos.dojotoolkit..org/demos/mail/ . > > What is your opinion? Should we replace the current Web UI with something > like that? It's more modern and the whole page rendering is slightly faster > since the reading of the sub pages is done with AJAX and that is by nature > asynchronous. > While that Web UI is usable with a DSPAM < 3.9.0 I am not going to jump > through fire rings to include it in anything else then DSPAM 3.9.0. > > I REALLY WANT 3.9.0 to get out this year! We are now almost hacking one year > on the code base and still have not published 3.9.0. > > So my question here: Who of you out there is already using 3.9.0 in > production? And can you please take the 1 minute time it needs to quickly > write here a feedback about 3.9.0 in your environment? PLEASE! I'm using 3.9.0b4 in production. It's working just fine, many times better than 3.8.0 that was running before. It's seems to have a greater stability, since it's running for 3 weeks without a core dump, it never happened before with 3.8.0. It has a greater accuracy too, I had issues because the size of mysql fields data type (things like int instead of longint) that was really annoying-me. It's better than 3.8.0 and it was a production version, 3.9.0 can be too. > > If no one has anything to say against the current 3.9.0 then I am going to > push as much as I can to get 3.9.0 out as soon as possible. Does any one here > have an objection against 3.9.0 or any reason that we should know why we > should not release 3.9.0? > > As a plus point I promise to either replace the current Web UI with something > more modern or at least include that small hack I have done for Paul in the > contribution directory. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Return on Information: > Google Enterprise Search pays you back > Get the facts. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev > > > > * Caro usurio, se este e-mail no foi corretamente classificado como spam, > encaminhe para s...@dspam.al.rs.gov.br. (+ informaes ? Ligue 1080) > > > !DSPAM:1,4b22623a193141401520848! > _______________________________________________ > Dspam-user mailing list > Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user > > > > * Caro usurio, se este e-mail no foi corretamente classificado como spam, > encaminhe para s...@dspam.al.rs.gov.br. (+ informaes ? Ligue 1080) > > > !DSPAM:1,4b22623a193141401520848! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
