On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:07:31 +0100 "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> yes, if email total score is above a fixed threshold, AND dspam > doesnt agree with this, then email is retrained into dspam. > It's the same mechanism than SA autolearn and, AFAIK, plugin crm114 > use this to retrain crm. > > I know that will be introduce some possible mistakes, but i think > balance between good and right will be ok. > What's your opinion on this ? should i try to do this, or it's better > to let DSPAM learn by himself and manually retrain it on error ? > This all depends on your needs. Do your users train DSPAM, CRM114 and/or SA? Or to put it the other way around: If you trust so much SA then why use CRM114 and DSPAM at all? What is the point? SA has a bayes engine it self so there is no much benefit in using DSPAM and/or CRM114 (with it's default setup/configuration). Why do you use 3 Anti-Spam engines when each of them depend on each other and one of them can drag the accuracy of all the others down? What is the reason that you use a heuristic engine like SA and two statistical like CRM114 and DSPAM? Could you write a little bit about how your users are using the Anti-Spam system? Do they train the engine? Are they able/allowed to train? Does every user has his own data set or do they all share the same data for ham/spam? What MTA do you use? -- Kind Regards from Switzerland, Stevan Bajić ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
