On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 12:03:28 -0400 Ed Szynaka <szyn...@localnet.com> wrote:
> I just want to say thanks for this explanation. Much more clear than the > README. I really feel like I get the point of all the syntax now. > I am trying to fix that logic now. Reading the README I see this here: ---------------------- groupname:classification:*globaluser This will automatically add globaluser as a classification peer to all users. Any user who has less than 1000 innocent messages or 250 spam messages in their corpus, or whose filter is uncertain about a particular message will consult the global dictionary for an answer. ---------------------- The documentation IMHO is not very clear. When is a global group consulted? Option A: [having less than 1000 innocent messages] OR [having less than 250 spam messages] OR [uncertain result about a particular message] Option B: ([having less than 1000 innocent messages] AND [having less than 250 spam messages]) OR [uncertain result about a particular message] The original code in DSPAM is not clear about the logic. It is a total mess. I personally would say that A is what should be implemented. What is your oppinion? > And just in case there was some misunderstanding; I've got no issues with the > merged group as its implemented, its just not quite what I need. > > Thanks, > Ed > -- Kind Regards from Switzerland, Stevan Bajić ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
