Stevan Bajić wrote: > On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 12:03:28 -0400 > Ed Szynaka <szyn...@localnet.com> wrote: > >> I just want to say thanks for this explanation. Much more clear than the >> README. I really feel like I get the point of all the syntax now. >> > Ohhh boy. I see now why it did not worked with my patch. This here is the > issue: > CTX->operating_mode == DSM_PROCESS > > So the DSPAM must be in processing mode. I guess that is not very logical for > a CLASSIFICATION group? >
Well I think that while the names create an unfortunate collison (--classify and CLASSIFICATION group) the line above does seem like it makes sense. Based on my reading of the README I thought --classify was used to determine an individuals results independent of group, mostly for testing. And the --process would use the group, even if that group was a CLASSIFICATION group. Ed -- Ed Szynaka Network/Systems Manager LocalNet Corp./CoreComm Internet Services ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
